CourtImmo vs Kiilt Pro
Category : AI-first brokerage assistant· KiiltOfficial site
Kiilt Pro shares our AI-first conviction and offers clear public pricing. CourtImmo goes further on business breadth (debt consolidation, borrower insurance, white-label for networks) and on the integration ecosystem, while keeping AI at the heart of the file.
In short
Kiilt Pro positions itself as "your brokerage assistant", built AI-first by a founder from credit risk. It is one of the few players putting AI at the core, with public per-user pricing.
CourtImmo vs Kiilt Pro
AI & automation
Credit-specific
Client experience
Model & architecture
Compliance support
Strengths of Kiilt Pro
- Clearly AI-first approach, close to our vision
- Public, readable pricing (55 to 75€/month/user)
- Recent, modern product, founder expert in credit risk
Limits versus CourtImmo
- No white-label for networks
- Debt-consolidation and insurance coverage still partial
- Young player: smaller installed base and integration ecosystem
Pricing
- CourtImmo: from 79€/month (Solo plan, all included, no commission)
- Kiilt Pro : 55 to 75€/month/user
Why brokers choose CourtImmo
Native AI document extraction: file data entry drops from about 45 minutes to 2 minutes.
100% paperless and modern full web, with no software to install and no legacy stack.
Transparent SaaS subscription, with no commission taken on your files.
Built for the six IOBSP broker profiles, from solo to white-label network.
Frequently asked questions
Are Kiilt and CourtImmo equivalent?
Both are AI-first, but CourtImmo covers a wider scope (consolidation, borrower insurance, network white-label) and addresses the six broker profiles, from solo to network.
How does pricing compare?
CourtImmo starts at 79€/month (Solo plan, all included); Kiilt sits between 55 and 75€/month per user. The right choice depends on the business scope you need.
Compare for yourself, on your files
Try CourtImmo in real conditions and measure the time saved from the very first file.
Comparison based on publicly available information, for informational purposes. Cited brands belong to their respective owners. Last editorial review: 2026-06-04